We have all seen scenes like this one play out on TV shows
like Law and Order: a suspect is taken into an interrogation room and a police
officer or two tries to elicit a confession from the suspect. The suspect is uncooperative, so the officers
begin to rely on deceptions, lies, and other trickery. Maybe something like: we found some
fingerprints, and we are running them right now, and we know they are going to
match, so you might as well confess before that happens and pray that gets you
some leniency. Courts have generally
held that confessions obtained because of deception can be used as evidence. However, on February 20, 2014, the New York Court of Appeals ruled unanimously that the deception can only go so far,
drawing a line between police tactics that are tolerable and the ones that move
into coercive territory.