This year, one of the most interesting cases the Supreme Court
had considered whether to hear is Elashi v. United States. This
case has ties to terrorism, inevitably bringing into play a certain level of
deference to the government’s national security interest; however the central
issue is whether the Sixth Amendment to the Constitution allows the government
to present evidence from anonymous witnesses. While Court denied the defendants’ petition for certiorari on
October 29, the case involves interesting questions that could be repeated in
the future.
Tuesday, October 30, 2012
DOJ Seeks to Stop the “school-to-prison pipeline” in Meridian, Mississippi
In the past, groups like ACLU and NYCLU have filed suits where policies and practices have led to the exacerbation of the “school-to-prison pipeline” problem. [1] In December of 2011, the U.S Department of Justice began investigating these practices in Lauderdale County in Meridian, Mississippi. The Department of Justice revealed its findings on August 10, 2012, and gave the city 60 days to address the violations listed in their report.[2] During the 60 days the city did not fully cooperate with the Department of Justice to resolve the inadequacies.
Tuesday, October 23, 2012
Giving Birth in Shackles
On October 17, 2012, it was announced that the Virginia Board of
Corrections approved tentative regulations to restrict the use of shackles on
pregnant inmates. Virginia’s regulations
to restrict the shackling of pregnant inmates come just weeks after California passed
Assembly Bill 2530 (AB 2530).[1] The Virginia regulations will permit
handcuffing pregnant inmates during transportation outside the jail but it will
prohibit all restraints during labor and delivery.[2] AB 2530 completely bans the use of shackles
on pregnant inmates while they are in labor, delivery, recovery, and even after
delivery. California’s bill prohibits restraint
by the wrists, ankles, or both, unless it is deemed necessary for the security
of the inmate or the safety of the staff or public. A federal court has concluded shackling
pregnant inmates during labor and delivery is unconstitutional. Yet, many states continue to use this
unconstitutional practice.
Friday, October 19, 2012
Is the Use of Checks Covered by Texas Money Laundering Law?
Tuesday, October 16, 2012
California Puts the Death Penalty Issue to Referendum
This November, voters in
California will be doing more than checking a box for a presidential
candidate. Proposition 34 on the
ballot asks voters to abolish the death penalty in favor of lifetime prison
sentences without the possibility of parole. The proposed statute would apply
retroactively, automatically commuting current death row prisoners’ sentences
to life imprisonment. If
California decides to abolish the death penalty, it will be the 38th
state to do so. Just last year,
both Illinois and Connecticut outlawed capital punishment by passing laws in
the state legislature. California
will leave the decision up to its state citizens by putting the question to a
referendum. According to California
state election law, Proposition 34 will only be repealed if it receives more “No” votes than “Yes” votes.
Friday, October 12, 2012
Art Theft: The Unseen Masterpiece
Sometime
between September 12 and September 14, 2012, burglars broke into the Santa Monica home of wealthy bond expert, Jeffrey Gundlach. While the exact target of the burglars
remains unknown, they surely recognized the monetary value of Mr. Gundlach’s
vast collection of expensive artwork from famous artists such as Joseph Cornell,
Piet Mondrian, Guy Rose, and Philip Guston. Sparing little, the burglars fled with roughly $10 million of
Mr. Gundlach’s possessions including thirteen paintings, a multitude of expensive
watches, and bottles of fine wine. In an ending seemingly scripted for Hollywood, the burglars
piled into Mr. Gundlach’s red Porsche Carrera 4S and drove away into the night,
but only after remembering to close the garage door on the way out.
Wednesday, October 10, 2012
Doing Time “Gangham Style”
Many people are familiar with the dancing inmates of the Cebu Provincial Detention and (DRC) thanks to their rendition of Michael Jackson’s “Thriller” that went viral on Youtube.[1] Well these dancing inmates are at it again, this time with a performance of Psy’s “Gangham Style”, the music video that now holds the Guinness World Record for most likes on Youtube. Cebu’s rendition of this music video has been uploaded for a little more than a week and already has over three million views.[2] While these videos are entertaining they also bring another question to mind. Is this choreographed exercise program at CPDRC a good form of rehabilitation?
Tuesday, October 9, 2012
Supreme Court Watch: Florida v. Jardines––October 31, 2012
On October 31st, the United States Supreme
Court will hear oral argument in Florida
v. Jardines, (October Term 2012, 11-564) (for the Florida Supreme Court’s
opinion click here). This case presents a Fourth Amendment
issue: Is a dog sniff at the front
door of a suspected grow house by a trained drug-detection dog a search
requiring probable cause?
Friday, October 5, 2012
Legalizing Prostitution
“Baby,
cash money.” With these words a
Colombian prostitute initiated a deal with a U.S. Secret Service Agent that
would eventually create a scandal and embarrass the entire agency. Widely
considered the “world’s oldest profession”––prostitution is the act of
performing sexual acts in exchange for money. It’s interesting
though, that the world’s oldest profession is a crime in many places. Just last week, on September 25, 2012, Anne Gristina plead guilty to running a prostitution ring in New York. She’s not the first person to be
convicted of assisting with prostitution. Heidi Fleiss is one of the more famous people who got convicted for participating
in the prostitution. Around the
world, in a survey of one hundred countries, at least 61% have some form of legal
prostitution. Today in the United
States, prostitution is illegal everywhere except for 11 counties in Nevada. Should
prostitution be a crime in the U.S.?
Tuesday, October 2, 2012
Will the Supreme Court Address Whether the Government May Abolish the Insanity Defense?
The Supreme Court’s new term started October 1st, but the Court met
on September 24th to consider whether to grant new cases. One case that the Court is still
considering hearing is Delling v. Idaho.[1] The main issue in Delling is whether Idaho violated the Fourteenth Amendment to the
Constitution by abolishing the insanity defense in criminal cases. The Court has never addressed what the
answer to this question might be; if the Court hears it, Delling will be the first time states have any guidance as to the
constitutionality of outlawing the insanity defense in criminal cases.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)